Gender Pronouns. They exist. Get used to them. All of them.

       

 

    So, you're saying you can only speak "English"?

    Too tired to learn new words?
  
    Too stupid to learn now concepts (I'm not calling you stupid, but I am suggesting that the idea is stupid).

    Too lazy to learn new pronunciations in addition to Pronouns?

     I mean, I can conjugate in French and German in addition to English. It is nothing special in today's multicultural world. You just got to remember;

 → Differing languages mean memorizing new words to many folks.
→Just got to learn them, then use them when appropriate.

    Even YOU probably know the Pronoun "Ms", pronounced "Mizz", to indicate you are not sure if the woman is married or not, so not to insult them, utilize "Ms" to indicate that you understand their gender, but not their married status.
 

    A very handy Pronoun to utilize. And feedback I've received indicates that they appreciated my faux-pas avoidance.

    Whoa, was I triggered or what? LOL.
Big Whup.../s

Perhaps in future, the type of Pronouns a person wishes to be identified can sport a "flag tattoo" on their foreheads. I mean, not every one can read the minds of folks they are talking to/with.
Each flag design can relate to a certain "Pronoun Preference", kind of like what Ships at sea use to signal their requirements/warnings/condition. 

He/Him, She/Her, They/Them, ey/em/eirs, zi/zir/zirs are the most popular "NeoPronouns.

I have found a list of most common Gender Pronouns, and will put that list at the bottom of this post.

So getting back on topic; Millions have learned Ship-Flag nomenclature, so with time, perhaps this will be a least-invasive/obtrusive/intrusive/rude/polite manner of pronoun identification. Hey, I said it first here!

I mean, a goodly percentage of other-pronoun'd already sport tattoo's of one variety or another.

    C'mon folks, start designing some kind of standardized design spreadsheet with pronoun options.

    That would be a much better idea than Sexuality Identification Tattoo's - too many folks are too tightly clasped to their fake-christian-bibles and trying to use absolutely no references to abuse those not the same as them. The Christian Right would like nothing better than to tattoo serial numbers on forearms as it seemed to "work in the past".

Sick Fucks!

THEY are the sicko's, not the rainbow coalition members.

    And extending this thought-turd, perhaps tattoo's can also advise others of one's "Furry" preference, with an open mouth to signify "capable of talking", or a diaper to signify "incapable of taking care of one's self" LOL.

    Who knows, weirder things have happened in the USA, eh? 
A statutory rapist as the head of the entire Legal Apparatus in the country?
Con-man and Fraudster convict as President?
Conspiracy Theorist Dr. in charge of Healthcare.
Junior Lawyer that could not afford to quit Trumps legal team (she had bills, apparently) will become the next Attorney General of the USA. Oh, yes, she "really" can think for herself, right? *wink* *wink*,

    Yeah, not such a stupid idea after all, eh? Just need someone with access to Photoshop to design pronoun/sexuality specific tattoo's that are small, mostly unobtrusive (you would want to be polite, right?) and simple in shape/colour.

    Perhaps start with a standard "outer perimeter shape", like Oval, Star, Rectangular, or even a colourized character design, like a capital "P" with the colour-combination detailing which Pronoun to be utilized.

    In the same manner, sexuality can be similarly "advised".
A "missionary position" icon to indicate Catholic.
A "missionary position with beer" to indicate Protestant.
A "Missionary position + superimposed seated position" to indicate swinger both ways.
    And so on. (No, I'm not suggesting Anglican. That'd piss off an entire nation of nose-punchers below Scotland.)

     A Brown Cross to signify Christianity (being brown, and not white), or white, to signify Religious-Right morons who have totally co-opted and mostly re-wrote the bible with ridiculous interpretations of already well-identified passages.

    "Jehovah's Witnesses" can use the number "144k" to indicate that in their re-written version of the Bible, only 144,000 Witnesses will be allowed to ascend into Heaven.
The rest? I dunno. Tough Luck, I guess...

Muslims → Star of Islam (Crescent moon +5-pointed star)

And on and on.

    No need to be so high and mighty about folks with different preferences, likes, dislikes, foods, languages, habits and much more. To even dislike a anothers preferences, no matter what language or nationality, is bigoted, misogynistic, and base-disgusting because of the sickness of such a position. I mean - those folks literally make me ill!
    It's like the opposite of a Possum. Instead of automatically feigning death when scared, a bigot will automatically turn violent (physically OR verbally) upon being "scared" by folks other than them. Or their customs, languages, foods, clothing, and more. They always seem to have a handbook with slurs and excuses nearby as reference.

But ask them to list one true "fact" - that cheat-book is worthless because they don't know, or are afraid to think for themselves.

If a person has issues with even ONE feature (which includes all subcategories mentioned above!) of another person, they need to stop and have a long think about their morals, ethics and honestly, their lives up to that point.
    I mean, since when is what another person does any of YOUR business? Unless it impacts the quality of YOUR life, Shut the Hell Up!

At Biden says, "Listen..." Anyone can be a Dick. But why?

My suggestion is simply laziness.

→Too lazy to learn about the others.
→Too lazy to learn that what they are told are lies, even though they suspect it.
→Too lazy to stand up and speak the truth.
→Too lazy to find good friends, and not other lazy folks with likely low standards and poor educations.

Whoa, was I triggered or what? LOL.
Big Whup.../

 

Here is the list - I could not copy/paste, so had to grab a screenshot. There is a ton of info on if you want to read more about these folks. 

 

Peace,
.- .-. 

 

 

 

Using GPS eroding memories of how to use Map and Compass. Along with usually well developed Sense of Direction or even Situational Awareness. This could be bad.

The Dean of the Academic Board-West Point - put out a video discussing Habitual GPS users and loss of map and compass skills and especially Situational Awareness!

Quite the eye opener, and honestly, it hit home with me. 

I have noticed the loss of some map reading skills - mostly that I don't use them much any more as I do have a cell phone always with me, but mostly for looking up shit, and not really communicating. My fingers are to friggin' big to tippy-tap at any cogent speed. 

 

(HINT) I often use the voice-to-text feature in WhatsApp to chat with my wife. I'm at home alone, and she's at work with others, so she will type her replies.

(Click on the word bar as if you were going to type something in there, then click on the small black microphone BELOW the word bar, and a recording screen. It will start recording immediately, but you can pause it to sort your shit out before you talk. Talk normally, not too fast, and a tiny bit of annunciation on some words may be required, but I find it about 98% accurate to what I say.)

The point the video makes is that the more you use a GPS, and even though you may have had, and used, standard map and compass training, consistent use of a GPS may very well erode your memory of how to use map and compass.

This is often a complaint of many who don't believe their GPS for one reason or another, and cannot find a good map any more, or even a decent, accurate and sturdy alcohol compass!
but when they finally get the hardware together, it takes a long time to remember the skills and mind-visualization required to properly read and assess a route/location on a Topographical map.

That, unfortunately is about the ONLY style of map that can accurately depict information for map users that everyone understands. In Edmonton, AB, MapTown, downtown used to be the source for many agencies for good Topographical Maps of various kinds.

I suppose mostly Hunters or Resource search agencies would still use these types of maps. I'd trust them over a GPS signal, and would hope the two would offer the same answer confirming each other.

 Listen, I have long loved map and compass exercises, and even a couple of long(er) Orienteering "contests". Canadian Army Sgt (ret'd). Loved to teach Map and Compass as well. I still have several (unclassified) Topo Maps from when I taught that subject, and hold onto them simply because they have pretty decent information laid out in an understandable fashion to anyone with the appropriate training.

Blackout Driving Orienteering. That's when you have the map in the passenger seat, some rookie Private in the operator's seat, and down the lane you go. Would you like to know the most commonly heard phrase from the passenger seat?

"Ah, fukkit, turn around, we musta missed a side-track". Yeah, blackout lights don't really offer any view to the sides. Sure made life interesting - and nights super long.

Modern HUD's can offer pin-point location information, with Military Dithering removed, right down to the centimeter level. Daylight-level night-vision is available on the Civilian market - Pin Camera's from AliBaba.com have amazing resolution (so they claim), and their night-vision security camera's offer amazing night-time visibility - enough to even "colourize" the image.
Holy Cow!

The stuff we have in our cell phones can, at best, get us locked to 3-5 metres. Perhaps better in open cities with more cell towers as well.

 Loved it.

Unfortunately, I'm also a Nerd, so I was into GPS when I took my PLGGR Instructor course way back when. (It was winter, and often location spikes were buried 3' under the snow...at minus 23°C. Arrrmy Training, SIR! LOL). However, we usually were within a few CM of the target pin, so our minds were totally blown on this course!

Then I bought the first B&W GPS device (Garmin?). I even had a small device I kept in my backpack to plug into my GPS-Less cell phone. The small device was the GPS Receiver, USB cable to my phone which used its processor to do the math and display onto an Map App, where I download maps from Google, and then I could track my own location/trace the track, and I think set some waypoints. Fairly basic - but for the time, it was groundbreaking for the civilian market.

But since I retired, I've been relying more and more on my cell phone's GPS App for getting around, even though I often know damned well where we are going.

I keep it up on my screen because
a. I can see the destination,
b. I can see road conditions, 
c. I can see user input to police activity/roadblocks/speed traps/speed camera's, and
d. I can record and archive each trip for historical reference. (Free App)

If you are using Google Maps, you can opt to get a monthly report on your "travels", including names of places you have stopped at.

(Some folks are Data-Shy, and don't like having a big-bro keeping track. That's fine. Free Choice, and all that stuff.)

I can keep track of how far I have driven each month/year. Additionally, you must know that I use my mobility scooter for over 95% of my trips, so it is handy as a tracker in case I have medical issues, my wife knows where I am. No extra cost. And yes, it's on my Android.

Admittedly, a few times I got confused between my brain and what the GPS is telling me, but it's only a matter of a bit of concentration to sort out reality LOL.

I do miss orienteering. But too old, too broken. 

 

Great Memories tho'!

True North Strong and Open for anyone for free, apparently. GreenPaper.

This is a slightly updated version as a majority of this was written shortly after President Trump took office and I gathered my notes to produce this rather shoddy affair.  But if you're interested in Arctic Sovereignty, then this might tickle your fancy. Grab a detailed map of Northern Canada to help you trudge through the details.
ELW Dec30/25

 

I've been sitting on this topic in my mind for about the past 10 years or so.  It really bothers me that my fellow soldiers and I served, fought, bled and partied to keep our lands free and open, but now fear that two major powers, Russia and the USA, may actually want to control the Canadian Arctic, and all it's resources.

They probably want Canada out of the way so they can divvy it up between the two of them.  Don't tell this to President #47, eh? 

ETA Dec30/25 I will add that the latest non-conspiracy-theory is that Trump, Putin and Zhejiang (or whatever) have their own plans.  Trump gets to control all of the America's, including Greenland. Putin gets all of Europe and Middle East and Africa, and China gets all of Asia, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines and Australia (as a holiday resort, I guess)

So here we go - Today's topic? Lots of debate on FaceBook and BlueSky with this latest meme.  

Here's my take on the post pictured just below. I call this document a Green-Paper, because I'm turning green with illness just thinking about all this mess. I'm getting too fardlin' old for this.

Enjoy the read,

Edwin.
alterfunker@duck.com

Well, well, WELL Well well. Just WHAT have I been saying for the past 10 years!!!

CBSA Crest

Honestly, Canada SHOULD be responsible for defense of the North. IF we want to keep our lands open and free - and more importantly, belonging to us, we must maintain access, utilize the land and control our borders physically, then patrol and supervise activities within our legal borders.

I mean, where the hell are the Canada Border and Customs Services Agency when you need them, eh?

 What folks keep forgetting is that Europe, China, Russia, the USA and others are waiting patiently on the sidelines to start sending super-tankers and super-cargo ships through the Northwest Passage, soon opening up with more loss of ice in the North, and soon may be open year round for sea traffic to get around issues with the Panama Canal and others. Save on fuel, time and money. 

 

Not only that, ALL of the world's major canals have a width maximum, and most bulk-cargo ships, and even some warships (Aircraft carrier, anyone?) barely fit into these Canals.  

 

War Planners and Commodities Agents both want larger ships to carry even more cargo per trip, and the Northwest Passage is the Answer for the Panama Canal, and possibly even the Suez Canal for Asian-Europe markets.

Imagine a crude oil carrier TWICE the width of current super-carriers?  They would fit in the NW Passages! Catamaran Cruise Ships have been on the drawing boards for decades.  Now they can build them.  They would fit in the NW Passages.

Who needs the Canals when everyone can use Canada's Northwest Passages??? Are we losing out on the financial opportunities this could support? Or are we too much wussy's to really start thinking for ourselves?

The Americans are especially hauling on their leash to get their super-cargo ships up and over to opposite oceans without spending millions on Canal fees. I can assure you, the new President will look North if someone pokes him hard enough - and I'm suggesting President Putin will do the poking.

 

So, what I'm saying is that if Canada wants to control this region and it's traffic, Canada needs a strong presence in the North, otherwise, some countries may bring to some international court that the Far North be deeded to be "free land" such as the South Pole, not belonging to anyone. 

 

Yup, why not just invite the Russians to come over to White Horse or Yellowknife for a beer while they are drilling up near Resolute???
Or every oil-spilling tramp ship to cruise through OUR waters, polluting along the way.
Or needing rescue/repairs/resupply - Canada will need a robust Northern Coast Guard, and they will have a hell of a long area to patrol!  
Police force?  
Fagetabutit

Didja know that in 2022, Canada's Arctic Postal Code had 1,661 ships entering the Arctic waters of Canada. Non-Canadian shipping!

AND, did you know that between 2013 and 2019, shipping activity in the Arctic region grew by 25% and continues to grow.  A major driver has been traffic in the Russian Arctic. 

Take heed of that last paragraph, because they are slowly moving towards Canada! More on this just below a bit.

 

Without a presence up North, Canada is effectively saying to the world that we don't care and come on over to use the Northern Route for free, carry anything you want. Nuclear Subs are welcome!!!  Pardon the sarcasm.

Ask yourself - What could Canada do if Russia suddenly put an ocean-going ship with deep sea drilling Rig for oil exploration.  Not a platform, just a ship. They'll run a pipe to another oil tanker to fill up as required. But they are in Canadian Waters.

What could we do?  Well, we could ask the Americans for help.  Weeeeel, there is a slight problem with that.  The problem is that the new American President is also a good buddy-buddy with Russia's Premier.  So much so that he will do anything to access more money for his personal bank accounts.

I just fast-scanned an Op-Ed, and one of the major take-away's was that the writer thought that a Inuit-led Northern Coast Guard could have stations set up every so often to patrol the Northern Arctic. Of course, they would need a couple of boats and motors thrown onto the back.

 

That's about all I scanned on that particular article, however, I will use my own wits from here on out. And the thoughts I've been mellowing upon for the past 10 or so years.

I firmly believe that the Arctic Patrol Vessels need to be built strong enough to work through a few inches of ice (I'm thinking about 15cm as a minimum...) and have anti-crush hulls. 

Think of a modern PT boat (Which the Swedish and Norwegians have mastered, and, incidentally, are selling...hint...hint...) The Swedes are lately pushing the "Stridsbåt 90 H(alv) (Strb 90 H; CB90)" Fast Military Assault Craft.  It alone as an Littoral Fast Attack Boat in itself is impressive, however, it's capabilities are such that these boats are selling worldwide - even the USA is using them for river Patrols. Mexico, Greece, Norway are some of the other navies utilizing these boats.

As the boats are built in Sweden, it is naturally capable of arctic operations with minimal upgrading, and I believe that a custom Steel Hull (up to just above the waterline is sufficient?) to help manage the ice I mentioned above, and more Arctic Stores for SAR, recovery and First Aid.  The boat alone is designed for 21 fully  kitted out troops, so I think in an emergency, could handle up to as many as 30 civilians/rescuee's in cramped conditions, 25 or less in a bit more comfort.

Look it up as the CB90-Class Fast Assault Craft.  Then imagine a fleet of 66 (plus some spares, so perhaps 80 ordered?) of these suckers patrolling our Arctic Waters alone.  No need for massive ships, Frigates (can be on standby?) or Nuclear Icebreakers. Yeah, Canada ditched Nuclear a long time ago, and does not have the time, space, training or personnel to add on anything nuclear.

I mean, as soon as folks start sending supertankers and Super Cargo Ships thru OUR NW Passage, WE are responsible for SAR, and any other emergency assistance a ship may require while transitioning between oceans. Calling any other country other than Russia is out of the question, and really, do we WANT to call Russians to help us if there is an emergency? Or major oil spills?  Who is going to pay for that?

 

While we are not exactly the Suez Canal or the Panama Canal, we can, potentially save Shipping Lines millions of dollars on each shipment by simply allowing these ships to take the Northern route to/from Asia to Europe.  Much Faster, no canal fees.

But hoooold on!  What do CANADIANS get out of this deal?  It's OUR waters other nations are riding on.  We should be COMPENSATED!

 

If we are going to need to fund all these boats, then all the personnel, the training, the equipment, the Station architecture, Supply, maintenance and housing of these folks will also be required to be funded.  

So, I'm thinking of 3 scattered "Main Bases" with all the amenities that then supply out to the 11 Arctic Stations where the Fast Boat Fleets are docked.  They "should" be routinely resupplied via RoRo's or similar, so a year round steady supply of items is available to all the northern fleets. 

ETA: Talk is of Littoral Combat Frigates with hovercraft on board for maritime patrolling.  I don't know how that'll work in the Arctic, but this is a recent topic. Dec30/25

Locations for Bases suggestions such as:

 

♣  Banks Island. Great location to access the remote north-western areas up to the tip of the Quttinirpaaq National Park way up in the North East. Actually, the park is so far up that it's past the Magnetic North Pole on the other side of the earth. 

 

 Banks Island will be responsible for Supply and Personnel/Maintenance for 4 Stations on the Western Approaches.

 

♣  Iquluit on Baffin Island.  Can patrol the Fox Basin/Channel and into the Hudson Bay, while also patrolling the Labrador Sea up to Baffin Bay, where the Third Station would take over. I'm thinking that by the look of Frobisher Bay leading to Iquluit may freeze over in early winter, making it a sucky idea for a station, and perhaps a more "seaside" port would be better.  I don't know.  Someone may.  But you get the idea.

 

♣ While I admit I'm ignorant of the populations living in the Arctic, I do see a lot of Inuit Owned Land labels on maps showing native lands.  The Inuit hamlet of Resolute (located in Resolute Bay on Cornwallis Island) is one of them. I'm suggesting that the Northwest Passage will be patrolled mostly by Inuit manned  "Northern Rangers Naval Security and Support Service - NRNSSS" (My idea - pass it on!) using the Fast "patrol/rescue" boats discussed earlier.

 

 

So Generally, here is my "plan of action" that I am making up right "off-the-cuff", and then we can pick it apart and look for better solutions.
[Hey!  Hovercraft!!! Ice OR Water!  Like the Vancouver Island CCG Station has!]
ETA Dec30/25 Oh, Hey! I did think of Hovercraft?  Well done, me!

Anyways, please use the map at Annex C at bottom as a reference to get a quick and dirty idea of potential Bases and Stations.
Remember, this is all assuming that the ice has melted enough for nearly 12 months free passage for larger vessels. [See Annex C at Bottom}

I think the two main "Super-Bases" that will supply the Northern Passage Bases should be located in St. Johns, Nfld, and Inuvik, NWT, both via land/sea links to the bases. Just thinking - an alternate port could be Halifax, as it has road/rail connections to the mainland.

So, on top of the 3 resupply Bases, I think that about a dozen Patrol Stations with provisions for a minimum of 6 months (1 year better) should be scattered throughout our Northern Areas. Crews could be rotated monthly.

I'm also thinking that the Northern Rangers could be expanded into Naval Rangers, with Naval capabilities - Training should not be too arduous as they are already used to these waters, and would probably kill to have a 2,000HP fishing boat that can go faster than 40kts, to "patrol" their areas.  They could also carry provisions (paid service aka Canada Post?) to very remote work camps, and so on. I'm thinking a snowmobile would also fit on the front deck.  Versions have been built with extra armour, extra electronic suites, command and control suites, more luxury for long-distance patrols, and even one with a decompression chamber for diving support!

Just thinking - the Naval Rangers should have something with a bit more firepower than the bolt-action M1's or whatever they are using now.  Fine and dandy for hunting, but not any self-defense capability.  Get them C-7's or something newer.  But don't forget the dual .50cal's for the front of the Boathouse.  More below, eh?

Whatever one wants, one can get in these boats.  I think it would be awesome to build them in Canada under license so we could add some Canadian "Gadgets" to the boats as well.  Secret stuff, y'know.  Gotta keep them Russkies off guard!

I've decided to call this new branch of the Northern Rangers the "Northern Rangers Naval Security and Support Services" which will provide security and safety to the entire Northwest Passages regions from Newfoundland to Alaska and most points North. NRNSSS .  Ssssnnnnore...LOL

 

I'm thinking having the stations about 3-400km apart would be a viable range between "most" of the Stations for mutual support.  The more outlying Stations should perhaps be built up with more "creature comforts" due to the long distance to any other Station or SAR.  This entire constellation of Stations and Bases will range from our American Border on the North, stretching all the way to Labrador and Newfoundland and the entrance to the Northwest Passages.

 

Take a sip of coffee and think about that for a minute! 

 

Manpower: Will be in Annex A below.

Equipment: Will be in Annex B below.

Gonna cost an arm and a leg.  But hold on - as the ice melts, it opens up the Tundra and areas to be explored for minerals and petroleum.  While this does sound intimidating, these already exist.  Up to and including offshore oil platforms.

 

FFS, It's not just the Russians. Canadians are doing this to ourselves. A Wishy-washy government that cares not for our military, and we really need to double it's size, quadruple the CCG, more Icebreakers (make 'em Nukes, for cryin' out loud!!!).

 

I'll leave you with this.  

 

If we don't do something about our Arctic Sovereignty, 

We might as well just let Russia have it.  Or sell it to the

Americans.  They might still have some beads and trinkets

they didn't give to the Russians for Alaska. 

As always,

Peace.

Edwin W. (IRL)
Alter Funker (FB)

 

 

Annex A

Manpower Breakdown

 

There are Four basic types of Naval Units.
Super Base - Supply Bases for the Arctic.

Arctic Base - 3 widespread Bases.

Arctic Stations - 11 widespread Stations

Arctic Detachments - 6 Detachments per Station.

Super Bases are St. John's Nfld and Inuvik NWT.  These will be the land-loaded support bases with warehousing for feeding everything to the 3 manned Arctic Bases via sea-going ships such as a RoRo or Arctic-capable Ferry, or other such fast supply ships. Massive amounts will be needed to be moved initially, so think bigger rather than small.  Also, initial construction will be required, strong enough to survive arctic winters if necessary.

Arctic Bases - Estimating approx 30 "permanent" daytime personnel from C3 (8), Supply, maintenance, Service Support (cooks, clerks, etc).  Aircrew? 

• Just to note - there is only a single shift as these folks only work 8-12hr days at most unless unloading incoming ships. Then it's all hands on deck!
• Suggest 2 month rotations with bases further south.
  

Arctic Stations - Each Station will require approximately 60 personnel to operate in shifts. Breakdowns are as follows:

• Suggest 1 month rotation. 
  
• 3 Shifts of 18 persons for Boat Operations. 54.
• OC, Sr. NCO, Clerk, Supply person, Cooks x 2, 2 x NCM's (Jr Ranks), 2 mechanics for boats, vehicles, Ute's, Quads and Snow Machines, and perhaps 2 x Signallers. 12
  Total 66. Call it 70 and we'll carry on.
  
  

Patrol Boats, each called a "Detachment", has a crew of 3. 

• Crew includes Pilot, Nav/pilot and Engineer. 
• 6 Patrol Boats per Station. Six crews on station unless out on Patrol.
• Each crew is called a Det, short for Detachment.

 

 Annex B

Essential Equipment Breakdown

SUPER-BASE:

• Large Warehousing
• Access to large loading Docks in harbour
• Civilian or military personnel or a mix would be required to administer to and support/load/deliver supplies.  That's waaaay above my paygrade!

ARCTIC BASE: 1 or more month(s) personnel rotation with mainland. (Seasonal?)

• These Bases will be responsible for between 3 or 4 Stations resupply and support.  See map at bottom for breakdown.
• Perhaps lodgings for some incoming flights???  
  
• Bases will receive shipments via large seagoing cargo vessels with a floating supply load always on hand in each ship.
• Bases will break down shipments to be sent to Stations via local supply ships. Fuel will be in high demand, so extra tankage will be required for the Patrol Vessels. 
• Mechanics. for boats, vehicles, Ute's, Quads and Snow Machines
• Perhaps 2 x Signallers to handle the unique communications requirements of the Arctic.
• Each Arctic Base should have it's own sea vessels, including at least one supply ship making semi-monthly deliveries to Stations.
• Each Arctic Base could perhaps in addition have some manner of a Hovercraft, as they are not only land/sea capable, they can also break ice to create a track for a stricken vessel to mover through.  Used often in the St. Lawrence Seaway! Why not the Arctic?
• Perhaps each Base could have some sort of Civilian Amenities as well, for the Boat Crews to relax between Rotations, if they don't go to the Mainland. 

ARCTIC STATION: 2 week rotation with Bases/Mainland, transport dependent.

In addition to the Station Camp and it's daily personnel :

• 6 x CB-90-class Fast Patrol Craft per station. Built under contract in Canada for our intended uses.
  
• I suggest that each Boat carry a SkiDoo on the fore-deck (under a tarp/hard cover???) as these boats can go right up to shore and drop a ramp to offload soldiers/snowmobiles! 
• I suggest that each Boat carry a RIB or powered Inflatable Assault Boat off back fantail.
• Boats should be reinforced and kitted for Ice Operations into the Fall and Spring.
• Boats can carry 21 fully kitted out troops, so a lot of storage space is available below decks for 24/7 operations.
• Suggest extra-large "patrol" tanks to double current ranges.
• Suggest Canada keep the dual .50cal guns mounted forward of the Bridge. A good look goes a Looooong way, if ya know what I mean. Just watch out for fish with a half-inch diameter hole through the body - if you can find the rest of the body...tells you crew has been doing some "target practice".
• What would be awesome is if each base also had a Hovercraft such as the Vancouver Island Coast Guard has, for when onshore travel is required, and snowmobiles won't cut it.  Or perhaps sign one out from one of the bases - but how to get them to the Stations?  Long freekin' trips to the two remote Stations, for sure!  Perhaps they are too far out?
  

 

Annex C

Base and Station Map of Canada's Arctic Regions and the Northwest Passages